Effect of two educational methods of lecturing and peer group on physical activity among 12-15-year-old students in health promoting schools

IRCMJ logo
PDF
HTML

Keywords

Intervention Study
Physical Activity
School
Student

How to Cite

haghparast, atefeh, Rohani, C., Vasli, P., Salmani, F., & Ahmadi Marzaleh, M. (2020). Effect of two educational methods of lecturing and peer group on physical activity among 12-15-year-old students in health promoting schools. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 22(10). https://doi.org/10.32592/ircmj.2020.22.9.59

Abstract

Background: Attention to the increase of students’ physical activity is one of the goals of Healthy People 2020. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of education on the students’ physical activity by using two methods of lecturing and the peer group.

Methods: In this quasi-experimental study, 142 female students (aged 12-15) were randomly selected and divided into two groups: lecture (n=71) and peer group (n=71). Two physical activity questionnaires; the Physical Activity Questionnaire for older Children (PAQ-C) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAC-Short Form), were filled out by the students in two phases, before educational intervention and eight weeks later. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 20 using the parametric (independent and paired sample t-tests) and non-parametric tests (Man Whitney U and Wilcoxon Signed-Ranked tests).

Results: The results of the study showed that the hypothesis: “the effect of the educational intervention program using two methods of lecture and education in the peer group is different on the physical activity of students” was accepted. In both groups, the level of physical activity was low in the beginning of the study. However, eight weeks after the educational intervention program, a significant increase was observed in the physical activity of students in the peer group, in comparison to the students in the lecture group using both questionnaires; i.e. PAQ-C (p<0.001) and IPAQ-Short Form (p<0.001). Also, measurement by two questionnaires showed that the number of students with low physical activity in the peer group declined (p=0.001), and the number of those with moderate physical activity was notably added (p<0.01).

Conclusions: Dynamism in the peer group causes sustainable learning in the domain of psychomotor skills. Therefore, this active teaching method can be developed in schools for increasing learning motivation of students in health programs by school or community health nurses.

https://doi.org/10.32592/ircmj.2020.22.9.59
PDF
HTML

References

  1. Taymoori P, Niknami SH, Ghofranipour F. Effects of a school-based intervention on the basis of Pender’s health promotion model to improve physical activity among high school girls. J Armaghan Danesh. 2008;12(2):46-59.
  2. Wolin K, Heil DP, Matthews CE, Askews S, Benneff GG. Validation of the international physical activity questionnaire-short among blacks. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5(5):746-60. doi: 10.1123/jpah.5.5.746. [PubMed: 18820348].
  3. Bates H. Daily physical activity for children and youth: a review and synthesis of the literature. Canada: Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute; 2006.
  4. Physical activity and health the benefits of physical activity. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Available at: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/everyone/ health; 2019.
  5. World Health Organization. Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.
  6. Allison KR, Adlaf EM, Dwyer JJM, Lysy DC, Irving HM. The decline in physical activity among adolescent student. Can J Public Health. 2007;98(2):97-100. doi: 10.1007/BF03404317.
  7. Park H, Kim N. Predicting factors of physical activity in adolescents: a systematic review. Asian Nurs Res. 2008;2(2):113-28. doi: 10.1016/S1976-1317(08)60035-3. [PubMed: 25031244].
  8. Taymoori P, Niknami SH, Ghofranipour F. Cognitive and psychosocial factors of physical activities among adolescents in Sanandaj by framework of Pender’s health promotion and stage of change models. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci. 2008;11(4):393-406.
  9. Kazemi A, Eftekhar-Ardabili H, Nekuei-Zahraei N. Pattern of physical activity and the promoters among adolescent girls of Isfahan. J Ghazvin Univ Med Sci. 2012;15(1):40-7.
  10. Physical activity. World Health Organization. Available at: URL: http://www.who.int/topics/physical- activity/en/; 2019.
  11. Dumith S, Gigante DP, Domingues MR, Kohl HW. Physical activity changes during adolescence: a systematic review and a pooled analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40(3):685-98. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq272. [PubMed: 21245072].
  12. Kelishadi R, Kahbazi M, Rabiei K, Heidari S, Doreh F, Baghaie A. Physical activity level among children of Markazi and Isfahan Provinces (2000). Arak Med Univ J. 2004;7(1):26-33.
  13. Ghaffari M, Sharifirad G, Malekmakan E, Hassanzadeh A. Effect of educational intervention on knowledge, attitude, and behavior about physical activity among grade 1 students of male high schools in Bavanat, Iran. J Health Syst Res. 2012;7(6):965-76.
  14. Dunn LL, Venturanza JA, Walsh RJ, Nonas CA. An observational evaluation of move to improve, a classroom based physical activity program, New York City Schools, 2010. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E146. doi: 10.5888/pcd9.120072. [PubMed: 22974754].
  15. Sutherland R, Campbell E, Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Okely AD, Nathan N, et al. A cluster randomized trial of a school-based intervention to prevent decline in adolescent physical activity levels: study protocol for the physical activity 4 everyone trial. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-57. [PubMed: 23336603].
  16. Ahmadi Tabatabaei SV, Taghdisi MH, Sadeghi A, Nakhaei N, Balali F. The effect of education in physical activities on knowledge, attitude and behavior of Kerman health center’s staff. J Res Health. 2012;2(1):55-62.
  17. Mounesan L, Sepidarkish M, Hosseini H, Ahmadi A, Ardalan G, Kelishadi R, et al. Policy brief for promoting physical activity among Iranian adolescents. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2013;31(233):510-20.
  18. Parhoodeh Y, Khezeli M, Bakhtiyari M, Delpisheh A, Latifi A. Effects of education based on Transtheoretical model on physical activity of college students. Health Syst Res. 2012;8(2):320-9.
  19. Plichta SP, Kelvin EA. Munro’s statistical method for health care research. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
  20. Kowalski KC, Crocker PR, Donen RM. The physical activity questionnaire for older children (PAQ-C) and adolescent (PAQ-A) manual. College Kinesiol Univ Saskatchewan. 2004;87(1):1-38.
  21. Dan SP Jr, Mohd Nasir MT, Zalilah MS. Sex and ethnic differentials in physical activity levels of adolescents in Kuantan. Malay J Nutr. 2007;13(2):109-20. [PubMed: 22691749].
  22. Guidelines for data processing and analysis of the physical activity questionnaire short and long form revised. International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Available at: URL: http://www.ipaq.ki.se/scoring; 2005.
  23. Solhi M, Zinatmotlagh F, Karimzade Shirazi K, Taghdisi MH, Jalilian F. Designing and implementing educational programs to promote physical activity among students: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Ofogh-E-Danesh. 2012;18(1):45-52.
  24. Oh JW, Lee EY, Lim JJ, Lee SH, Jin YS, Song BK, et al. Result from South Koreas 2018 report card on physical activity for children and youth. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2019;17(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2018.10.006. [PubMed: 30662511].
  25. Huang WY, Wong SH, Sit CH, Wong MC, Sum RK, Wong SW, et al. Result from Hong Kong 2018 report card on physical activity for children and youth. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2019;17(1):14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2018.10.003. [PubMed: 30662509].
  26. Wu CL, Chang CK. Result from the Chinese Taipei (Taiwan) 2018 report card on physical activity for children and youth. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2019;17(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2018.10.005. [PubMed: 30662508].
  27. Kahn EB, Ramsey LT, Brownson RC, Heath GW, Howze EH, Powell KE, et al. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22(4):73-107. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00434-8.
  28. Fisher A, Reilly JJ, Kelly LA, Montgomery C, Williamson A, Paton JY, et al. Fundamental movement skills and habitual physical activity in young children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(4):684-8. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000159138.48107.7d. [PubMed: 15809570].
  29. Kelishadi R, Rabie K, Khosravi A, Famouri F, Sadeghi M, Shirani SH. Assessment of physical activity of adolescents in Isfahan. J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci. 2001;3(2):55-66.
  30. Ziaee V, Kelishadi R, Ardalan G, Gheiratmand R, Majdzadeh SR, Monazzam MM. Physical activity in Iranian students CASPIAN Study. Iran J Pediatr. 2006;16(2):157-64.
  31. Sistani M, Khoi M, Taghdisi MH. Promoting knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of the mothers in their girls’ pubertal health based on peer education approach. J Babol Univ Med Sci. 2010;11(6):33-9.
  32. Xiao N, Zhao H. Effects of lectures and peer education on knowledge and attitude about AIDS among students of college of science and engineers. Chin J Health Educ. 2004;20(5):402-5.
  33. Stanhope M, Lancaster J. Community and public health nursing. 6th ed. St. Louis, USA: Mosby Company; 2016.
  34. Parvizi S, Ahmadi F. Adolescence health and friendships: a qualitative study. FEYZ J Kashan Univ Med Sci. 2007;10 (4):46-51.